|
Oct.
31, 2004
Presidential Prediction:
Contradictions and History Be
Damned
Despite the Washington Redskins losing at home, which has
been an accurate predictor of the incumbent president losing
his reelection since the 1936 campaign, President Bush will
win a second term on Tuesday. So goes the Culture Drift prediction.
Today, at least. If incorrect, alcohol and Halloween fever
will be blamed.
All signs point to Bush losing to Senator Kerry, but still
somehow he will prevail. Bush is facing a divisive nation,
and a strong and organized opposition. Some people despise
the man, his administration and his war in Iraq. The level
of personal vitriol against him is at Reagan or Nixon levels.
His approval rating has been below 50 percent consistently,
a usual indicator of an incumbent’s fate. One other
sign, Kerry’s Boston Red Sox overcoming an 86-year
“curse” to win the World Series at Bus(c)h Stadium
in St. Louis last week.
But history be damned, rules were made to be broken and
signs can prove false. Bush will win again because despite
all the bad news on Iraq, the return of Osama and iffy economic
future, his opponent has never been able to sustain a lead
in the polls. Not since the Republican convention has Kerry
been in the lead. In any game, the team that holds the lead
usually prevails. The other team is playing catch-up as
Kerry has been. His performance in the debates was able
to close the gap, but across most polls Bush maintains a
two or three point lead.
Incumbents facing second term reelections normally lose
big or win big. The losers: Herbert Hoover, George H.W.
Bush, and Jimmy Carter. The winners: Ronald Reagan, Richard
Nixon, and Bill Clinton. This Bush seems to be in a category
all by himself. One where he maintains the support of his
first election, without gaining or losing converts. His
consistent lock-up of 48 percent of likely voters in the
polls shows incredible stability with his base. Who is the
Kerry base? Bush haters?
This election is all about Bush. He is a polarizing figure
that evokes passion, where none appears to exist for Kerry.
There is hatred towards Bush, not much love for Kerry. That
is the problem. A better campaigner or more appealing figure
(Bill Clinton, for example) would have been able to capitalize
on the bad trends and indicators for Bush. On the flip side,
the Red States are very much pro-Bush; they are as motivated
to see him win reelection, as the Bush-haters are to see
him lose. John Kerry is just that other guy in the election.
After Tuesday, he will just another guy that could have
been president.
|